<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: (More) Bipartisanship!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ctlocalpolitics.net//2007/03/10/more-bipartisanship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ctlocalpolitics.net//2007/03/10/more-bipartisanship/</link>
	<description>Connecticut politics and elections: discussion, analysis, opinion, news and maps</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 17:17:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Genghis Conn</title>
		<link>http://ctlocalpolitics.net//2007/03/10/more-bipartisanship/comment-page-1/#comment-2695</link>
		<dc:creator>Genghis Conn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 22:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctlocalpolitics.net/2007/03/10/more-bipartisanship/#comment-2695</guid>
		<description>All right, enough. This is accomplishing nothing, and violating the rules for commenting. Comments here are closed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All right, enough. This is accomplishing nothing, and violating the rules for commenting. Comments here are closed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ctkeith</title>
		<link>http://ctlocalpolitics.net//2007/03/10/more-bipartisanship/comment-page-1/#comment-2694</link>
		<dc:creator>ctkeith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 22:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctlocalpolitics.net/2007/03/10/more-bipartisanship/#comment-2694</guid>
		<description>&quot;REAL MEN&quot;,LOL

What branch and what war were you in again?

Sorry ACR,

&quot;REAL MEN&quot; don&#039;t believe in preventive war and don&#039;t have to twist intel in order to mislead a country into a War they have no idea what they were getting in to.

&quot;REAL MEN&quot;  really listen to the Experienced Generals and PREPARE for a war and make dam sure they committ enough troops to make that war as short as possible.

&quot;REAL MEN&quot; would have stayed in Afganistan and captured Bin Laden even if that meant crossing into Pakistan to get him.

&quot;REAL MEN&quot; also READ the intel that says &quot;BIN LADEN DETERMINED TO STRIKE INSIDE THE U.S. and shake the trees instead of going to Texas and cutting brush.

and &quot;REAL MEN&quot; NEVER,NEVER,NEVER use what other members of their family did in defense of this country as evidence of THEIR bravery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;REAL MEN&#8221;,LOL</p>
<p>What branch and what war were you in again?</p>
<p>Sorry ACR,</p>
<p>&#8220;REAL MEN&#8221; don&#8217;t believe in preventive war and don&#8217;t have to twist intel in order to mislead a country into a War they have no idea what they were getting in to.</p>
<p>&#8220;REAL MEN&#8221;  really listen to the Experienced Generals and PREPARE for a war and make dam sure they committ enough troops to make that war as short as possible.</p>
<p>&#8220;REAL MEN&#8221; would have stayed in Afganistan and captured Bin Laden even if that meant crossing into Pakistan to get him.</p>
<p>&#8220;REAL MEN&#8221; also READ the intel that says &#8220;BIN LADEN DETERMINED TO STRIKE INSIDE THE U.S. and shake the trees instead of going to Texas and cutting brush.</p>
<p>and &#8220;REAL MEN&#8221; NEVER,NEVER,NEVER use what other members of their family did in defense of this country as evidence of THEIR bravery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ACR</title>
		<link>http://ctlocalpolitics.net//2007/03/10/more-bipartisanship/comment-page-1/#comment-2693</link>
		<dc:creator>ACR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 20:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctlocalpolitics.net/2007/03/10/more-bipartisanship/#comment-2693</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Unfortunately sometimes their Dads never matured enough to check their inexperience or maybe are still trying to work through their own feelings of inadquacies (sic) or regrets&lt;/i&gt;

Sorry Keith, real men defend their country and of you don&#039;t think 9.00 a gallon gas would flatten the economy out to point of people living and starving in our streets then you simply haven&#039;t thought it through.

I&#039;m sure your fore bearers were opposed to both the revolution (a tyrant here or across the ocean what&#039;s the diff?) as well as the Civil War (the one where Lincoln lied to the American people regarding the original reason for)

Nope - as long as you&#039;ve got yours, to hell with the rest of the planet or anyone here that disagrees with your warped leftist views.

BTW - don&#039;t play &quot;tough guy&quot; with Republicans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;<i>Unfortunately sometimes their Dads never matured enough to check their inexperience or maybe are still trying to work through their own feelings of inadquacies (sic) or regrets</i></p>
<p>Sorry Keith, real men defend their country and of you don&#8217;t think 9.00 a gallon gas would flatten the economy out to point of people living and starving in our streets then you simply haven&#8217;t thought it through.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure your fore bearers were opposed to both the revolution (a tyrant here or across the ocean what&#8217;s the diff?) as well as the Civil War (the one where Lincoln lied to the American people regarding the original reason for)</p>
<p>Nope &#8211; as long as you&#8217;ve got yours, to hell with the rest of the planet or anyone here that disagrees with your warped leftist views.</p>
<p>BTW &#8211; don&#8217;t play &#8220;tough guy&#8221; with Republicans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ctkeith</title>
		<link>http://ctlocalpolitics.net//2007/03/10/more-bipartisanship/comment-page-1/#comment-2692</link>
		<dc:creator>ctkeith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 20:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctlocalpolitics.net/2007/03/10/more-bipartisanship/#comment-2692</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s expected that college age children will be overly aggressive and a little ignorant. 

Unfortunately sometimes their Dads never matured enough to check their inexperience or maybe are  still trying to work through their own feelings of inadquacies or regrets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s expected that college age children will be overly aggressive and a little ignorant. </p>
<p>Unfortunately sometimes their Dads never matured enough to check their inexperience or maybe are  still trying to work through their own feelings of inadquacies or regrets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toucan</title>
		<link>http://ctlocalpolitics.net//2007/03/10/more-bipartisanship/comment-page-1/#comment-2677</link>
		<dc:creator>toucan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctlocalpolitics.net/2007/03/10/more-bipartisanship/#comment-2677</guid>
		<description>Just about half of the Republicans in the US Senate are to the &quot;left&quot; of Lieberman on Iraq if anyone from either side wants to be objective on the issue.
And invade Iran? With what Army?
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2007-03-12-officer-shortage_N.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just about half of the Republicans in the US Senate are to the &#8220;left&#8221; of Lieberman on Iraq if anyone from either side wants to be objective on the issue.<br />
And invade Iran? With what Army?<br />
<a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2007-03-12-officer-shortage_N.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2007-03-12-officer-shortage_N.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TrueBlueCT</title>
		<link>http://ctlocalpolitics.net//2007/03/10/more-bipartisanship/comment-page-1/#comment-2675</link>
		<dc:creator>TrueBlueCT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 14:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctlocalpolitics.net/2007/03/10/more-bipartisanship/#comment-2675</guid>
		<description>Invade Iran? With what army?

Pretty far out! But good on you for showing your true colors...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Invade Iran? With what army?</p>
<p>Pretty far out! But good on you for showing your true colors&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ACR</title>
		<link>http://ctlocalpolitics.net//2007/03/10/more-bipartisanship/comment-page-1/#comment-2673</link>
		<dc:creator>ACR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 13:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctlocalpolitics.net/2007/03/10/more-bipartisanship/#comment-2673</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;Which war did you fight in

Actually you&#039;re the one running the mouth, where were YOU?

My son feels we should invade and totally occupy Iran right now; additionally No. Korea&#039;s nuke capability&#039;s should be rendered useless immediately and that country should be occupied and controlled by China (better them than what&#039;s there now) and 
Hezbolla should be eliminated from the face of the earth.

I&#039;m hoping he gets his degree 1st so he can go in as on officer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;Which war did you fight in</p>
<p>Actually you&#8217;re the one running the mouth, where were YOU?</p>
<p>My son feels we should invade and totally occupy Iran right now; additionally No. Korea&#8217;s nuke capability&#8217;s should be rendered useless immediately and that country should be occupied and controlled by China (better them than what&#8217;s there now) and<br />
Hezbolla should be eliminated from the face of the earth.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m hoping he gets his degree 1st so he can go in as on officer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TrueBlueCT</title>
		<link>http://ctlocalpolitics.net//2007/03/10/more-bipartisanship/comment-page-1/#comment-2668</link>
		<dc:creator>TrueBlueCT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 03:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctlocalpolitics.net/2007/03/10/more-bipartisanship/#comment-2668</guid>
		<description>ACR--

Which war did you fight in? My hat&#039;s off to you, and I hope your son joins the Marines, (what an honorable calling), but I also hope he doesn&#039;t get sent into the Iraq quagmire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ACR&#8211;</p>
<p>Which war did you fight in? My hat&#8217;s off to you, and I hope your son joins the Marines, (what an honorable calling), but I also hope he doesn&#8217;t get sent into the Iraq quagmire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ctkeith</title>
		<link>http://ctlocalpolitics.net//2007/03/10/more-bipartisanship/comment-page-1/#comment-2667</link>
		<dc:creator>ctkeith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 03:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctlocalpolitics.net/2007/03/10/more-bipartisanship/#comment-2667</guid>
		<description>ACR,

I guess you must be rooting for the Sunni insurgents since  Liberty demands ridding ones country from any occupier (remember that American revolution) before it can take root.

Maybe your son will join in time for W to bring Liberty,at any cost of course,to Saudi Arabia where all those 9/11 hijackers came from.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ACR,</p>
<p>I guess you must be rooting for the Sunni insurgents since  Liberty demands ridding ones country from any occupier (remember that American revolution) before it can take root.</p>
<p>Maybe your son will join in time for W to bring Liberty,at any cost of course,to Saudi Arabia where all those 9/11 hijackers came from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ACR</title>
		<link>http://ctlocalpolitics.net//2007/03/10/more-bipartisanship/comment-page-1/#comment-2666</link>
		<dc:creator>ACR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 02:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctlocalpolitics.net/2007/03/10/more-bipartisanship/#comment-2666</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;&lt;I&gt;I just wish, in the meantime, that you and Lieberman were sending your kids to Iraq&lt;/i&gt;

My son&#039;s been been talking to the Marines. He&#039;s to my right politically - by quite a bit.

The family&#039;s been in every war including the Revolution; several were also involved in the underground railroad as well.

Frankly - the &quot;illegals&quot; I know in Danbury and elsewhere impress me more than many of the posters in here, with their (the illegals) respect for liberty at any price.

No &quot;chickenhawks&quot; here; but quite a few turkeydoves and several Dodos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;<i>I just wish, in the meantime, that you and Lieberman were sending your kids to Iraq</i></p>
<p>My son&#8217;s been been talking to the Marines. He&#8217;s to my right politically &#8211; by quite a bit.</p>
<p>The family&#8217;s been in every war including the Revolution; several were also involved in the underground railroad as well.</p>
<p>Frankly &#8211; the &#8220;illegals&#8221; I know in Danbury and elsewhere impress me more than many of the posters in here, with their (the illegals) respect for liberty at any price.</p>
<p>No &#8220;chickenhawks&#8221; here; but quite a few turkeydoves and several Dodos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TrueBlueCT</title>
		<link>http://ctlocalpolitics.net//2007/03/10/more-bipartisanship/comment-page-1/#comment-2665</link>
		<dc:creator>TrueBlueCT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 01:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctlocalpolitics.net/2007/03/10/more-bipartisanship/#comment-2665</guid>
		<description>And oh yeah, the more you Republicans want to support Bush&#039;s war, the more seats you&#039;re going to lose in 2008. I just wish, in the meantime, that you and Lieberman were sending your kids to Iraq...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And oh yeah, the more you Republicans want to support Bush&#8217;s war, the more seats you&#8217;re going to lose in 2008. I just wish, in the meantime, that you and Lieberman were sending your kids to Iraq&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TrueBlueCT</title>
		<link>http://ctlocalpolitics.net//2007/03/10/more-bipartisanship/comment-page-1/#comment-2664</link>
		<dc:creator>TrueBlueCT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 01:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctlocalpolitics.net/2007/03/10/more-bipartisanship/#comment-2664</guid>
		<description>And I want a pony...

How many more American families need to be destroyed before you all cure yourselves of delusion?

Even the Iraq Study Group concluded &quot;winning&quot; was a pipe-dream.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I want a pony&#8230;</p>
<p>How many more American families need to be destroyed before you all cure yourselves of delusion?</p>
<p>Even the Iraq Study Group concluded &#8220;winning&#8221; was a pipe-dream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ACR</title>
		<link>http://ctlocalpolitics.net//2007/03/10/more-bipartisanship/comment-page-1/#comment-2663</link>
		<dc:creator>ACR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 00:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctlocalpolitics.net/2007/03/10/more-bipartisanship/#comment-2663</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;&lt;I&gt;What does this mean??? It means that Republicans lost because they misread our country–we want to win. Joe wants to win and that is why he won.&lt;/i&gt;

You&#039;re pretty bright, Rightyright.

Are you involved in GOP politics at all, TC level, anything? If not you should be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;<i>What does this mean??? It means that Republicans lost because they misread our country–we want to win. Joe wants to win and that is why he won.</i></p>
<p>You&#8217;re pretty bright, Rightyright.</p>
<p>Are you involved in GOP politics at all, TC level, anything? If not you should be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rightyright</title>
		<link>http://ctlocalpolitics.net//2007/03/10/more-bipartisanship/comment-page-1/#comment-2662</link>
		<dc:creator>Rightyright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 23:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctlocalpolitics.net/2007/03/10/more-bipartisanship/#comment-2662</guid>
		<description>Dear CGG-What you wanted was a pacifist on Iraq--Joe aint that.  

Your guy-Lamont-wanted out of Iraq, yesterday--and he lost big time.

In blue Ct you could not pulloff your plans to vacate Iraq.  

What does this mean???  It means that Republicans lost because they misread our country--we want to win.  Joe wants to win and that is why he won.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear CGG-What you wanted was a pacifist on Iraq&#8211;Joe aint that.  </p>
<p>Your guy-Lamont-wanted out of Iraq, yesterday&#8211;and he lost big time.</p>
<p>In blue Ct you could not pulloff your plans to vacate Iraq.  </p>
<p>What does this mean???  It means that Republicans lost because they misread our country&#8211;we want to win.  Joe wants to win and that is why he won.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CGG</title>
		<link>http://ctlocalpolitics.net//2007/03/10/more-bipartisanship/comment-page-1/#comment-2660</link>
		<dc:creator>CGG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 20:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctlocalpolitics.net/2007/03/10/more-bipartisanship/#comment-2660</guid>
		<description>If Lieberman&#039;s position on the war had been moderate no one would have primaried him.  Plenty of Democrats get away with being moderate on Iraq and the War on Terror.  Actually had Lieberman actually spent more time talking with local Democrats before the primary about his position he probably would have won that primary.  Even Dems who disagreed with him would have appreciated him making the effort.

I&#039;ll admit to being farther to the left than most, but believe it or not I believe in bipartisanship, and nonpartisanship.  Senator Lieberman doesn&#039;t.  He&#039;s not looking for solutions to problems.  He&#039;s looking to enhance his own image.  And yes, I have big problems with that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Lieberman&#8217;s position on the war had been moderate no one would have primaried him.  Plenty of Democrats get away with being moderate on Iraq and the War on Terror.  Actually had Lieberman actually spent more time talking with local Democrats before the primary about his position he probably would have won that primary.  Even Dems who disagreed with him would have appreciated him making the effort.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll admit to being farther to the left than most, but believe it or not I believe in bipartisanship, and nonpartisanship.  Senator Lieberman doesn&#8217;t.  He&#8217;s not looking for solutions to problems.  He&#8217;s looking to enhance his own image.  And yes, I have big problems with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RedRidden</title>
		<link>http://ctlocalpolitics.net//2007/03/10/more-bipartisanship/comment-page-1/#comment-2659</link>
		<dc:creator>RedRidden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 19:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctlocalpolitics.net/2007/03/10/more-bipartisanship/#comment-2659</guid>
		<description>What point would that be, CGG?  I may be right-of-center, but I certainly have issues with the extremist whackjobs on my side of the aisle too.  MY point is that the occasional moderate stance is indicative of a common-sense approach to the issues, of being able to not only see but understand both sides.

Settle down.  I&#039;ve got issues with the Ann Coulters and Jerry Falwells of the world too.  I just find it interesting that Dems never denounce the radical wing of their party...in fact, more often than not, they embrace it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What point would that be, CGG?  I may be right-of-center, but I certainly have issues with the extremist whackjobs on my side of the aisle too.  MY point is that the occasional moderate stance is indicative of a common-sense approach to the issues, of being able to not only see but understand both sides.</p>
<p>Settle down.  I&#8217;ve got issues with the Ann Coulters and Jerry Falwells of the world too.  I just find it interesting that Dems never denounce the radical wing of their party&#8230;in fact, more often than not, they embrace it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CGG</title>
		<link>http://ctlocalpolitics.net//2007/03/10/more-bipartisanship/comment-page-1/#comment-2658</link>
		<dc:creator>CGG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 19:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctlocalpolitics.net/2007/03/10/more-bipartisanship/#comment-2658</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Nutmeg, I agree. It’s only to extremist whackjobs that Lieberman is divisive.&lt;/I&gt;

You just made my point.  Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Nutmeg, I agree. It’s only to extremist whackjobs that Lieberman is divisive.</i></p>
<p>You just made my point.  Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RedRidden</title>
		<link>http://ctlocalpolitics.net//2007/03/10/more-bipartisanship/comment-page-1/#comment-2657</link>
		<dc:creator>RedRidden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 19:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctlocalpolitics.net/2007/03/10/more-bipartisanship/#comment-2657</guid>
		<description>CGG, Lieberman is making every effort to put an end to the fiery invective that has come to plague the D.C. culture.  What is actually bi-(and even occasional non-) partisanship, YOU and the rest of out-there-in-left-field creation are perceiving as divisive, polarizing, and controversial behavior.  Democrats view him as such -- only within the context of their party -- because he won&#039;t &quot;fall in line&quot; with the stances they want him to take.  I can&#039;t believe we&#039;ve come to expect blind, follow-the-leader representation from our Reps and Sens.  Well, at least now there&#039;s an explanation for why Murphy and Courtney got elected...

Nutmeg, I agree.  It&#039;s only to extremist whackjobs that Lieberman is divisive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CGG, Lieberman is making every effort to put an end to the fiery invective that has come to plague the D.C. culture.  What is actually bi-(and even occasional non-) partisanship, YOU and the rest of out-there-in-left-field creation are perceiving as divisive, polarizing, and controversial behavior.  Democrats view him as such &#8212; only within the context of their party &#8212; because he won&#8217;t &#8220;fall in line&#8221; with the stances they want him to take.  I can&#8217;t believe we&#8217;ve come to expect blind, follow-the-leader representation from our Reps and Sens.  Well, at least now there&#8217;s an explanation for why Murphy and Courtney got elected&#8230;</p>
<p>Nutmeg, I agree.  It&#8217;s only to extremist whackjobs that Lieberman is divisive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nutmeg_constitution</title>
		<link>http://ctlocalpolitics.net//2007/03/10/more-bipartisanship/comment-page-1/#comment-2653</link>
		<dc:creator>nutmeg_constitution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 18:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctlocalpolitics.net/2007/03/10/more-bipartisanship/#comment-2653</guid>
		<description>CGG, the Republican candidate did not get &quot;screwed.&quot;

He created his own problems.  If his view of the war on terror were similar to that of Lieberman, then I would have voted for him.  As far as I&#039;m concerned, he&#039;s a John Murtha registered as a Republican.

And I&#039;m also very proud to have Lieberman as my U.S. Senator.  Not so long ago, he was chosen as the Democratic candidate for Vice President of the United States ... for good reason.  It&#039;s the Cindy Sheehan-type Democrats who are freaking out about him ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CGG, the Republican candidate did not get &#8220;screwed.&#8221;</p>
<p>He created his own problems.  If his view of the war on terror were similar to that of Lieberman, then I would have voted for him.  As far as I&#8217;m concerned, he&#8217;s a John Murtha registered as a Republican.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;m also very proud to have Lieberman as my U.S. Senator.  Not so long ago, he was chosen as the Democratic candidate for Vice President of the United States &#8230; for good reason.  It&#8217;s the Cindy Sheehan-type Democrats who are freaking out about him &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toucan</title>
		<link>http://ctlocalpolitics.net//2007/03/10/more-bipartisanship/comment-page-1/#comment-2652</link>
		<dc:creator>toucan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 17:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctlocalpolitics.net/2007/03/10/more-bipartisanship/#comment-2652</guid>
		<description>Joe is definitely a chooch. But, more importantly,I am always interested to see how ctkeith, a Democrat like Lieberman himself, can take a complicated situation and boil it down to a few choice partisan soundbites much like Joe does; ctkeith&#039;s states simplisticly that &lt;i&gt;the Patraeus plan has failed &lt;/i&gt; when the truth (that Joe distorts over and over again but ctkeith buys into obviuosly) is that Lt. Gen. Petraeus is implementing a plan that was handed to him - not one he developed himself - and he is now doing his best working the situation in Iraq and modifying the plan so that we can suceed.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/09/world/middleeast/09iraq.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe is definitely a chooch. But, more importantly,I am always interested to see how ctkeith, a Democrat like Lieberman himself, can take a complicated situation and boil it down to a few choice partisan soundbites much like Joe does; ctkeith&#8217;s states simplisticly that <i>the Patraeus plan has failed </i> when the truth (that Joe distorts over and over again but ctkeith buys into obviuosly) is that Lt. Gen. Petraeus is implementing a plan that was handed to him &#8211; not one he developed himself &#8211; and he is now doing his best working the situation in Iraq and modifying the plan so that we can suceed.<br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/09/world/middleeast/09iraq.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/09/world/middleeast/09iraq.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
