<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Mrs. Dodd&#8217;s Deals Fishy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ctlocalpolitics.net//2009/05/06/are-mrs-dodds-deals-fishy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ctlocalpolitics.net//2009/05/06/are-mrs-dodds-deals-fishy/</link>
	<description>Connecticut politics and elections: discussion, analysis, opinion, news and maps</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 17:17:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Rubenstein</title>
		<link>http://ctlocalpolitics.net//2009/05/06/are-mrs-dodds-deals-fishy/comment-page-1/#comment-44665</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Rubenstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 17:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctlocalpolitics.net/?p=4038#comment-44665</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Wait — are you serious? Mahoney, Lender and McEnroe put John Rowland behind bars. Are you honestly suggesting they have something against Democrats?!?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

  Mr Dobb.....your poor-mouthing that the Courant writers  don&#039;t go after Democrats is in error. I have seen their articles on Joe Ganim,Ernie Newton,Eddie Perez and many others.The reason why they haven&#039;t gone after a Democratic Governor yet is because we havent had one since 1990, but rest assured if and when we have a Democratic Governor, and if and when there is corruption in that Governor&#039;s administration, they will write about it with the same fervor  that they do about Republican corruption.We need a impartial and strong 4th estate  to keep both parties in check and honest.The best dissinfectant is the light of day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Wait — are you serious? Mahoney, Lender and McEnroe put John Rowland behind bars. Are you honestly suggesting they have something against Democrats?!?</p></blockquote>
<p>  Mr Dobb&#8230;..your poor-mouthing that the Courant writers  don&#8217;t go after Democrats is in error. I have seen their articles on Joe Ganim,Ernie Newton,Eddie Perez and many others.The reason why they haven&#8217;t gone after a Democratic Governor yet is because we havent had one since 1990, but rest assured if and when we have a Democratic Governor, and if and when there is corruption in that Governor&#8217;s administration, they will write about it with the same fervor  that they do about Republican corruption.We need a impartial and strong 4th estate  to keep both parties in check and honest.The best dissinfectant is the light of day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Rubenstein</title>
		<link>http://ctlocalpolitics.net//2009/05/06/are-mrs-dodds-deals-fishy/comment-page-1/#comment-44664</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Rubenstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 17:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctlocalpolitics.net/?p=4038#comment-44664</guid>
		<description>I agree Anderson....both parties seem to have a system whereby the non elected Senatorial spouce becomes a lobbyist/director/consultant  for a large amount of money.This is how  the elected person is paid off by the political elite and by those large companies and interest groups  that might have legislative business before Congress.While it seems  to be all perfectly legal,it doesn&#039;t pass my individual smell test.While I recognize  that folks do not take a vow of poverty to attain elected  office and while I do agree that folks need  to have 2 income earners often,I wish there was a better way.

 I absolutely agree  with you about Rell,Caliguri and Lieberman and the Courant  writers,who seem  to be going after Mrs Dodd  for something that many others do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Anderson&#8230;.both parties seem to have a system whereby the non elected Senatorial spouce becomes a lobbyist/director/consultant  for a large amount of money.This is how  the elected person is paid off by the political elite and by those large companies and interest groups  that might have legislative business before Congress.While it seems  to be all perfectly legal,it doesn&#8217;t pass my individual smell test.While I recognize  that folks do not take a vow of poverty to attain elected  office and while I do agree that folks need  to have 2 income earners often,I wish there was a better way.</p>
<p> I absolutely agree  with you about Rell,Caliguri and Lieberman and the Courant  writers,who seem  to be going after Mrs Dodd  for something that many others do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Dobb</title>
		<link>http://ctlocalpolitics.net//2009/05/06/are-mrs-dodds-deals-fishy/comment-page-1/#comment-44663</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Dobb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 17:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctlocalpolitics.net/?p=4038#comment-44663</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Where were Mahoney and Lender when it came to Haddasah Lieberman working as a lobbyist for Hill &amp; Knowlton?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Wait -- are you serious?  Mahoney, Lender and McEnroe put John Rowland behind bars.   Are you honestly suggesting they have something against Democrats?!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Where were Mahoney and Lender when it came to Haddasah Lieberman working as a lobbyist for Hill &amp; Knowlton?</p></blockquote>
<p>Wait &#8212; are you serious?  Mahoney, Lender and McEnroe put John Rowland behind bars.   Are you honestly suggesting they have something against Democrats?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndersonScooper</title>
		<link>http://ctlocalpolitics.net//2009/05/06/are-mrs-dodds-deals-fishy/comment-page-1/#comment-44656</link>
		<dc:creator>AndersonScooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 16:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctlocalpolitics.net/?p=4038#comment-44656</guid>
		<description>Bruce, the influence peddling, back-scratching and nepotism run deep. On both sides of the aisle.

What&#039;s incredible is that after putting this above the fold on Sunday, yesterday the Courant gave this another story, which was just recycling the last.

Where were Mahoney and Lender when it came to Haddasah Lieberman working as a lobbyist for Hill &amp; Knowlton?

And of course the CT GOP said not a word as they gladly embraced the back-stabbing Lieberman against Lamont.

Anyway, I look forward to Lender and Mahoney digging into the client list of Sam Caliguiri&#039;s law firm, Day Pitkin. That&#039;s got to be an even bigger conflict of interest than Jackie Dodd&#039;s board memberships.

PS-- Lender could also write about Governor Rell&#039;s son Michael, who she got a plum $70,000/year job as a Republican staffer at the Statehouse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruce, the influence peddling, back-scratching and nepotism run deep. On both sides of the aisle.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s incredible is that after putting this above the fold on Sunday, yesterday the Courant gave this another story, which was just recycling the last.</p>
<p>Where were Mahoney and Lender when it came to Haddasah Lieberman working as a lobbyist for Hill &amp; Knowlton?</p>
<p>And of course the CT GOP said not a word as they gladly embraced the back-stabbing Lieberman against Lamont.</p>
<p>Anyway, I look forward to Lender and Mahoney digging into the client list of Sam Caliguiri&#8217;s law firm, Day Pitkin. That&#8217;s got to be an even bigger conflict of interest than Jackie Dodd&#8217;s board memberships.</p>
<p>PS&#8211; Lender could also write about Governor Rell&#8217;s son Michael, who she got a plum $70,000/year job as a Republican staffer at the Statehouse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Rubenstein</title>
		<link>http://ctlocalpolitics.net//2009/05/06/are-mrs-dodds-deals-fishy/comment-page-1/#comment-44654</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Rubenstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 16:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctlocalpolitics.net/?p=4038#comment-44654</guid>
		<description>It  would be interesting  to  see who many other  spouces,male and female, of Senators have directorships of any kind. I bet there are many who do, of both parties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It  would be interesting  to  see who many other  spouces,male and female, of Senators have directorships of any kind. I bet there are many who do, of both parties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
